|
OCTOBER 2000
Ever since the
personal computer boom, innovation has rolled in as regularly as the surf
on the Pacific. There has always been something new – PCs,
enterprise computing or computer networking – the swells all coming
in at convenient intervals. Indeed, the venture capitalists and
entrepreneurs even likened their skill to that of a surfer: catch the
wave too early or too late and you would end up dunked; find the perfect
wave, time it just right, and the returns make up for all the risk.
Until now. Some Silicon Valley veterans are starting to
wonder whether their time is up, whether there are any more waves. And a
growing number of the 1990s generation are
heading off into sabbaticals, or more normal working hours at blue-chip
companies.
Linked to the Nasdaq decline, the dry-up of funding and simple
exhaustion after half a decade of 80-hour weeks, this scare is the most
threatening of all those to hit Silicon Valley’s self-image. But if
the surf season has ended, we can see why by looking at current
buzzwords.
B2B.
Business-to-business services offering a marketplace for steelmakers
suffered as badly as consumer internet companies in Nasdaq’s
spring stock meltdown. Part of the sector – ventures providing
software solutions to big businesses – has recovered, along with
the share price of market leaders such as Ariba.
But these are companies that look suspiciously like the enterprise
resource planning software giants that are anything but new. The B2B
exchanges, which got all the business school graduates excited with their
new models, are generally in trouble.
Infrastructure. The
emblem of this sector is Loudcloud, a glorified
web hosting company set up by Marc Andreessen, the founder of Netscape.
His own trajectory tracks the change in Silicon Valley – from software that
defined the internet to server computer maintenance. Is infrastructure
the new thing? Hardly. Infrastructure is Silicon Valley’s safe haven –
always has been – and that is why the sector is reassuring to newly
risk-averse venture capitalists.
Optical networking. A
subset of infrastructure, the part that can claim novelty, this is
extremely lucrative. However, there is a growing sense that it is the
last unpopped bubble of the tech boom. And,
even if valuations are justified, the excitement is lost on most venture
capitalists and entrepreneurs: the technology is too arcane to
understand.
Wireless. When
moreover.com, the company I helped found, went out on a $21 million
investment round in April, I received a piece of advice: ‘Include a
slide on the wireless opportunity,’ I was told. Such was the
valuation magic of a play on the merger of the internet and mobile
communications. Well, the backlash against this has already started
– at least in Europe – as reporters wake up to the fact that
consumers are rejecting the first generation of mobile internet phones.
The mobile internet will have its day, sometime in 2003. Until then,
there will be plenty of start-ups drowning. As Silicon Valley’s old hands would say,
it’s all about timing.
P2P. Person-to-person
is the hottest phenomenon right now. Its popularity reflects the success
of person-to-person exchanges such as eBay compared with the monolithic
online stores such as amazon.com, weighed down by the inventory it has to
carry. Another boost to P2P has been the astounding success of Napster,
the online music exchange, to which I am listening as I write this. But
there is a big question. Do P2P services work only where they allow
individuals to infringe companies’ intellectual property rights? If
so, person-
to-person is unlikely
to spark
a new generation of start-ups.
Biotech. The current
interest in biotech is, in fact, evidence of the loss of faith in
computer industry innovation. After five years in the internet, a friend
is seriously considering a return to college to study it. He figures
that, by the time he returns to the job market in his late thirties,
he’ll have a chance to ride the next big wave. Implicit in that is
a belief that the internet is over.
These are just
today’s fleeting obsessions. With so many analysts, reporters and
opinion-leaders trying to justify their existence and fill pages, Silicon Valley’s technology-hype
complex is probably minting a new phrase even as we speak. But there is a
difference this time. As quickly as a new trend emerges, so it is
debunked. B2B lasted all of five months. P2P may survive no longer than
the verdict on the Napster case.
All these waves lack
conviction and so, ultimately, this is reflected in a dearth of new start-ups.
For every stereotypical business school carpetbagger who started
companies in Silicon Valley in the expectation of gigantic financial reward,
there is a founder who believed he was changing the world. Now some of
that drive has gone. It appears that the world has had enough change for
the moment.
Nick Denton, a
founder of First Tuesday, is CEO of online news aggregator moreover.com
(nick@moreover.com)
|