|
MAY 2001
Last spring, when raising funding for Moreover, the web intelligence
company that I co-founded, we pitched Benchmark Capital. To anyone
outside the world of technology that may not mean much. But the time was
April 2000, the place was Sand Hill Road, and this was as good as it
got.
The Benchmark
offices, on Silicon Valley’s equivalent of Wall Street, were plush in a
dress-down, ground-scraping, west coast way. The
assistants, all beautiful, lulled waiting entrepreneurs with charm and
cookies. The conference room, where business plans were picked apart, had
James Bond automated window blinds, and – gasp! – a display socket embedded in the table.
Benchmark partners
were not just venture capitalists at a time when venture capital had
eclipsed investment banking in prestige. They were gods. They had the
multi-billion-dollar successes of eBay and Ariba
behind them, a glowing profile in Business Week and Randall
E Stross’s account of their meteoric
rise, eBoys. It was the hot firm of Sand Hill Road.
And the seven
partners looked the part. All over six
foot. David Beirne,
the former headhunter famed for luring Jim Barksdale to Netscape, looks
like the Aryan ideal. When asked how he could manage 11 board seats (the
other partners had only eight) he answered:
‘I have more
testosterone than they do.’ Then there was Bill Gurley, a former
basketball player, intellectual godfather of the net market while still a
20-something analyst and journalist; so tall and confident that his
column in Fortune was called ‘Above the Crowd’.
In the US, and specifically Silicon Valley (unlike Britain), success is celebrated, and
failure seen either as the occasional price of success or the precursor
to it. In Silicon Valley, you buy personal reputations as you buy technology
stocks: on the dips.
But this decline in
technology valuations has been more than a dip. Internet rumour sites speculate that Benchmark’s boomtime fund might actually lose money for
investors. And internet gossip columnist Chris Nolan spread a story that
Gurley and Beirne might both be leaving
Benchmark.
Now, VC partnerships
do not disclose their investment returns to the media, and Benchmark
pooh-poohs the story about departures. eBay,
Benchmark’s flagship internet investment, has withstood the market
correction better than any other significant dot.com.
Nevertheless, the
icons of the technology boom are subject to a much more critical press
than at any time in the past 10 years. It is almost as if reporters and
investors are making up for the easy ride they gave them in 1999 and
2000. Cases in point:–
Tim Koogle – CEO of Yahoo!
– was seen as
the ideal internet company career executive. A big-company background,
but enough of a hippy to bond with the portal’s young founders.
Yahoo! is now looking for a new CEO from traditional media.
Jeff Bezos, CEO of Amazon, was Time’s Man of the
Year. He is now subject to stories about insider selling. His braying
laugh, once thought endearing, is now described as annoying.
Mary Meeker usually
topped those ‘most influential women in technology’ lists.
She, like most other internet analysts, is now ridiculed for issuing
buy-recommendations throughout the decline in tech share prices.
Jay Walker, once credited for reinventing price-setting
with Priceline’s reverse-auction model,
now fields questions about his personal finances.
Dave Perry, who
turned an MBA into a B2B exchange called Chemdex
and a paper-money billion, has had his fortune wiped out. And Eric
Greenberg, founder of Viant and Scient, was revealed by eCompany
Now magazine as a fabulist who neglects his mother.
So who still commands
respect? I’ve heard people talk flatteringly about porn and
gambling entrepreneurs: at least they address real consumer demand. Some
VCs, such as Jim Breyer of Accel,
were sceptical enough of dot.coms
to reap the credit now. The same goes for Warren Buffett,
who stayed away from technology stocks because he said he did not
understand them.
Hard-core technology
also brings credibility. Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer are riding high:
Microsoft is one of the few companies driving innovation, and Silicon Valley, like a runaway teenager
returning home, is now more deferential.
Vinod Khosla,
the Kleiner Perkins partner who invests in
obscure optical networking companies that get sold for billions, is the
venture capitalist of choice for the Silicon Valley business magazines.
Unfortunately, they
lined him up for the front covers before Cisco’s revenues started
to suffer, and the bottom fell out of the optical networking sector. Time
for another icon to fall?
|