weblog
monday, march 24
On war coverage
An excellent takedown of overhyped media coverage of the war, from Ralph Peters. Every low-level firefight seems a great battle to them. Each pause in the advance is read as a worrisome delay. While they see friendly casualties up close, they rarely witness the devastation inflicted on our enemies. And when isolated groups of Iraqis do stand and fight, the journalists imply it means the Iraqi people are opposed to our intervention.
Winning big [New York Post]
#

recent posts...

front page

and previously...

· Globalization
· On war coverage
· Raed returns
· Fear
· In perspective
· Al-Jazeera, streaming
· Saddam as Ceausescu
· War mood chart
· Update
· BBC World
· A reporter in Baghdad
· Coalition slump
· War links
· Mapping the invasion
· Variable geometry
· Email from Iraq
· Lileks on the war
· 11.10 EST: Drudge down
· Right war, wrong reasons, reprised
· Iraq news
· On the Iraqi border
· France's Napoleon complex
· On risk
· Spurning the French
· An Arab case for war
· Bruner, reluctant hawk
· Jews and the war: some sense
· The right war, the wrong reasons
· Jews and the war
· 10th anniversary
· Iraq: come join us
· Forbes's best blogs
· Saddam doll
· IM pop-ups
· Saddam futures
· Iraqi civilian casualties
· Last of the secrets
· Puma busts its nut
· Bush visit to Blair?
· Jewish conservatives
· The Irish conspiracy
· Pat Buchanan
· French as an official language
· France and Africa
· Jews and the war
· Don't feed the Israelis
· Thomas Friedman
· Clueless AP
· Friends of Frank
· Osama spiked